Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '19 at 23:51
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 135 2-Core 215 86% 148 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 354 46% 347 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2791 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 161 Parallax 149 119% 152 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 141 Splatting 117 103% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195 1,486 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 407 419 306 176 224 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 446 Mixed 362 SusWrite 310 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 40.9 147% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 206 189% 291 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 108%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 20GB free Firmware: 10RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 394 Write 399 Mixed 299 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 18.3 118% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 54.6 94% 179 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 80GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,902 Write 1,490 Mixed 820 310% 1,404 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 58.2 201% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 583 DQ Mixed 669 532% 755 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-3200 4x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 37.8 102% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 23.3 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	197x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16