MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics174% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,224
111% 931 Pts
64-Core 1,668
103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 247
Parallax 267
200% 253 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 238
Splatting 148
175% 224 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 174%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 941 1144 1163 1173 1175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,895
Write 1,792
Mixed 806
SusWrite 1,118
314% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 60.7
210% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 1,089
DQ Mixed 1110
851% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 262%
Great: 302%
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB
358GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1242 1240 1232 1230 1233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1,937
Write 1,774
Mixed 826
SusWrite 1,270
325% 1,452 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 62.2
222% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,546
DQ Write 1,291
DQ Mixed 1,196
956% 1,344 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 286%
Great: 293%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
554GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 56.2
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 91
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 142 144 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 112
SusWrite 140
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 101%
WD WD10EZEX-00ZF5A0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 166 182 181 181 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 201
Write 165
Mixed 112
SusWrite 177
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 103%
WD My Passport 25E4 4TB
794GB free, PID 25e4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 64.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 64.4
83% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3867 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 33.9
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 33.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 45.7
88% 45.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback