| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z370-P (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190715 |
| Uptime | 8.7 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 25 '19 at 12:55 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
98.2%
Outstanding
|
97% 175 Pts
|
87% 722 Pts
|
71% 1,152 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
127%
Outstanding
|
143% 179 fps
|
117% 144 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 452 455 460 351 308 MB/s
|
120%
Outstanding
|
101% 449 MB/s
|
186% 65.8 MB/s
|
242% 344 MB/s
|
|
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
367GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 447 450 455 459 459 MB/s
|
120%
Outstanding
|
100% 444 MB/s
|
178% 64.5 MB/s
|
239% 339 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
168GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 252 215 208 208 207 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
82% 369 MB/s
|
206% 73.9 MB/s
|
266% 359 MB/s
|
|
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 449 451 457 460 460 MB/s
|
122%
Outstanding
|
101% 450 MB/s
|
186% 67.9 MB/s
|
238% 341 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
|
111%
Outstanding
|
111% 38.8 GB/s
|
99% 34.6 GB/s
|
92% 43.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,350 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $94
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $192Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 3,272x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 2,414x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 1,357x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1,152x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 949x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 755x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $524 |