MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 12:35
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 942
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,335
83% 1,335 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 57.6
54% 63.3 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 71.2
58% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1029 1538 1552 1408 1497 1434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,712
Write 1,815
Mixed 1,401
SusWrite 1,410
409% 1,834 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 74.3
248% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 676
510% 690 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 303%
Great: 393%
LENSE30256GMSP34MEAT3TA 256GB
199GB free
Firmware: 1.4.0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 299 298 299 299 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 902
Write 703
Mixed 859
SusWrite 341
157% 701 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 39.8
172% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 517
383% 498 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 130%
Great: 181%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 135 132 130 130 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 140
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 132
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
306% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 113%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 138 137 137 130 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 73
SusWrite 138
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.1
308% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $680
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback