Lenovo 20193

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20193  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '16 at 05:02
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 175
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 448
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB
CLim: 1191 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.9
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 15
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 508
Write 114
Mixed 194
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 11
63% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 38.9
30% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 81%
Sandisk U100 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 10.54.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 236
Write 57.4
Mixed 88.2
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 9.23
4K Mixed 4.88
31% 9.04 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 7.79
DQ Mixed 5.32
8% 16 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 26%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
737GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 68.1
Write 56.7
Mixed 82.7
53% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.24
68% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20193 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback