Acer Nitro AN517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Superb_CFS
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 09:27
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 620
71% 552 Pts
64-Core 605
38% 605 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1334) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 38.8
43% 48.4 fps
MRender 44.4
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 51.3
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 868 671 424 474 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,492
Write 1,476
Mixed 1,151
SusWrite 698
270% 1,204 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 55.9
184% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 914
669% 869 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 197%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/16G ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 24GB
2400, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-51 Builds (Compare 2,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback