Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120420
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '19 at 19:59
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 77.3 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 129 56% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 170 25% 181 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 780GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 100 106 115 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 82.8 Write 108 Mixed 39 SusWrite 103 60% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 100%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID c82a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 5 5.2 5.2 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 4.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.9 8% 6.65 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 7%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 6GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 27.7 Write 26 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 27.3 35% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.4 175% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5474-014.A00LF 99U5474-004.A01LF 5GB 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 5.1 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	39x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	34x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	31x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
SU655 120GBAdataBench 68%, 3,439 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	9x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples	7x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16