Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 142
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 438
41% 344 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Gigabyte(1458 2274) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 33.6
24% 31.7 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 33.5
25% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 89 88 84 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 83.1
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.5
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
190GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48% Average
Read 86.3
Write 85.3
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 80.8
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
4TB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 99.5
Mixed 62
SusWrite 105
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 100%
13GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 13 9.8 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 82.3
Write 7.8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 13.4
26% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
157% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback