Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 78 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 123 53% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 208 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Lighting 72 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 63.8 59% 69.8 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 72 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 581ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 100 103 102 102 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.6% Average	Read 173 Write 177 Mixed 163 SusWrite 98.7 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 29.9 101% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 67.1 DQ Mixed 35.2 30% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 112GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 159 150 151 152 151 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 172 Write 179 Mixed 173 SusWrite 154 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 32.2 105% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 55.5 DQ Mixed 38.2 30% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 450GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 101 103 102 102 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 184 Write 141 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 100 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EWB4GB681CA3-16IC F3-1600C11-4GIS000 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.4% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 14.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 84.3 47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	9x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16