Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 04:40
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,156
103% 873 Pts
64-Core 2,188
135% 2,188 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 200
Parallax 183
153% 190 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 189
Splatting 132
122% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 575 816 722 880 937 932 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,457
Write 899
Mixed 898
SusWrite 810
278% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 59.3
210% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 83.3
216% 462 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 242%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
84GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 495 442 168 172 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 492
Mixed 423
SusWrite 321
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 63.4
215% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Drobo 5D 2TB
1TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 70 80 73 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60% Good
Read 183
Write 189
Mixed 141
SusWrite 77.2
194% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.3
197% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60%
Great: 90%
Drobo 5D 17.5TB
8TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 70 80 73 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63% Good
Read 173
Write 213
Mixed 110
SusWrite 77.1
190% 143 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1.6
292% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 39
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 38.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback