| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3397 |
| Memory | 7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130716 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 21 '19 at 16:55 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20%
Poor
|
18% 23.4 fps
|
23% 28 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
29%
Poor
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
24% 8.53 GB/s
|
50% 80.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,418 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,469x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,467x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 799x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,923x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 726x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 490x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |