Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 10:45
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 685
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 61.3
57% 67.5 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 69
Splatting 70
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 418 445 450 448 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 440
Mixed 432
SusWrite 418
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 46.1
149% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 278
232% 336 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
147GB free
Firmware: 02.05D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 57.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 55.9
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
174GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 50.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 63.2
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
95GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 49 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 48
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 49
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 0837 2TB
2TB free, PID 0837
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 106 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 105
123% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Adata CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Adata 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback