Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '19 at 06:00
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 95.8 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 746 76% 614 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1298 MHz, MLim: 1521 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 26.4 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 32.1 22% 27.8 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 25.9 24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 297GB free (System drive) Firmware: UK500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 77 88 204 205 269 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 460 Write 370 Mixed 298 SusWrite 170 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 20.1 79% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 45.6 48% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 6.1 6.8 7.7 7.2 7.8 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 8.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 6.6 10% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3000C16 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3000C16 24GB 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98.9% Outstanding	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 31.2 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 41.2 SC Mixed 29.7 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 54.7 73% 54.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,002x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	254x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16