Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110217
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 975 1,372 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 96.3 1-Core 16.4 2-Core 124 50% 78.8 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 245 33% 245 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1638 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Lighting 81.2 Reflection 84.2 Parallax 95.9 66% 87.1 fps	MRender 80.7 Gravity 90.1 Splatting 67.1 64% 79.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 378 381 394 392 383 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 430 Write 422 Mixed 370 SusWrite 372 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 30.4 99% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 262 197% 262 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 134%
Ct480bx2 0 480GB 366 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 349GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 231 79 77 77 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 430 Write 380 Mixed 369 SusWrite 139 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 27.2 95% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 216 165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 111%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 386GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 112 124 124 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 119 Write 111 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 119 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 72%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 132 131 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 142 Write 141 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 132 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 74 59 42 23 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 162 Write 157 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 52.9 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL8-4GBZM0 F3-14900CL8-4GBZM0 F3-14900CL8-4GBZM0 F3-14900CL8-4GBZM0 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	45.8% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 17 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $15Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16