Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '16 at 01:39
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 95 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 191 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 367 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 2305) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 340.62 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.08 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 893GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 173 1866 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 227 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 160 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 225 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 182 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	83.6% Excellent	Read 129 Write 162 Mixed 128 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.37 101% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 99P5471-002.A00LF 2x2GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $135Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	89x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	75x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	32x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x

RAM
DDR3 1600G 2x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 1,144 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $513

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16