Dell Precision M4800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision M4800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0V5GVY
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 07:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4940MX
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 173
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 535
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Dell(1028 05CC) 2GB
CLim: 666 MHz, MLim: 752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 389.8
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 5.87
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.04
5% 6.42 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LITEONIT 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC91
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 331 371 344 331 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 329
Write 338
Mixed 182
SusWrite 344
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 19
77% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 182
171% 266 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4800 Builds (Compare 2,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback