Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '19 at 07:25
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	65%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 68.5 1-Core 83.3 2-Core 175 62% 109 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 568 54% 445 Pts	64-Core 722 45% 722 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% MSI(1462 C729) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.28 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.8% Excellent	Lighting 93.3 Reflection 108 Parallax 108 76% 103 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 109 Splatting 89.5 90% 113 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 74 64 77 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 113 Write 103 Mixed 65 SusWrite 68.8 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 109%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 36.5 Write 37.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 38.3 49% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 3200 DDR4 3000 24GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 20.8 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	401x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	134x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	52x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16