Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 00:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 763
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
82% 105 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 94
Splatting 98.7
79% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 156 185 52 75 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 502
Write 444
Mixed 419
SusWrite 156
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 29.5
139% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 48.6
103% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
234GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 80.3
Write 79.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 79.7
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
104GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 111 111 119 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 14.2
Write 101
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 113
47% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 Kingston KHX2400C15/16G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback