IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00W2444
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 21:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 103
36% 63.1 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 475
42% 356 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M1115 299GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 63 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63% Good
Read 156
Write 67.8
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 63.9
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63%
Great: 116%
IBM ServeRAID M1115 598GB
245GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 82 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 320
Write 87.6
Mixed 111
SusWrite 85.7
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
282% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7EFR8A-H9 HMT351R7EFR8A-H9 Samsung M393B5273CH0-YH9 Samsung M393B5273CH0-YH9 HMT351R7EFR8A-H9 Micron 18KSF51272PDZ1G4M1 Samsung M393B5273CH0-YH9 Samsung M393B5273CH0-YH9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 25.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback