Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime6 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 12:31
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 859
90% 720 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 129
Parallax 131
116% 134 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 133
Splatting 105
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1211 240GB SSD 754D117-820
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS121101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 285 181 186 130 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 459
Write 301
Mixed 284
SusWrite 188
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 36.2
129% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 100
118% 205 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 93%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
112GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 75 76 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 483
Write 320
Mixed 327
SusWrite 100
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 31.7
141% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 194
170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 85%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
375GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 79 78 75 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 78
Write 74.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 77.1
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
610GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 183 176 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 180
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
524GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 170 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 130
Write 91.2
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 169
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
829GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 83 80 80 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 22.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 81.4
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
319GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 121
Write 106
Mixed 30
SusWrite 92.8
112% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 27.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 29.3
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $745
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback