Acer Swift SF314-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-58  (all builds)
MotherboardCM Strongbow_CM
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 146
2-Core 275
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 586
67% 521 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 140E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 6.97
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 16.1
10% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 705 747 746 746 748 748 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1,136
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 740
234% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 69.3
233% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,070
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 191
328% 650 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 204%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 24.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-58 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback