MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 23:41
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,004
96% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,438
89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 141
Parallax 142
121% 144 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 124
Splatting 102
106% 134 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 192 38 25 23 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 446
Write 300
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 90.9
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 12.3
48% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 20.1
15% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 56%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
377GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 435 477 489 490 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 487
Mixed 411
SusWrite 474
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.7
220% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Pcie SSD 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2027 1047 1023 1028 1033 684 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,582
Write 2,529
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 1,140
395% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 68
234% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,453
DQ Write 1,245
DQ Mixed 1,352
1,012% 1,350 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 265%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback