Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HK 20,362 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 58 2-Core 138 54% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 454 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Asus(1043 13F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 71.2 8% 30.9 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 76.7 60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SKC2000 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 272% 613GB free Firmware: S268 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1078 1229 1278 1555 1419 1390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	205% Outstanding	Read 1,314 Write 1,480 Mixed 121 SusWrite 1,325 238% 1,060 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 50.9 182% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 242 205% 312 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 205% Great: 357%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 458 351 294 177 271 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 1,089 Write 990 Mixed 915 SusWrite 338 186% 833 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 47.6 144% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 832 DQ Write 670 DQ Mixed 248 323% 584 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 235%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 232GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 122 121 122 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 122 Write 117 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 121 71% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9905703-002.A00G M471A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9905630-031.A00G 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	78% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 26.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 20.7 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

CPU
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	225x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	442x

SSD
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	94x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	78x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $31Bench 183%, 9,202 samples	39x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	148x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 76%, 4,237 samples	123x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 79%, 500 samples	44x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16