Asus M5A97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 17:39
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 134
62% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 296
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365C) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 8.73
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 9.31
7% 8.54 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.17
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 240GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 344 338 349 347 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 169
Write 330
Mixed 220
SusWrite 343
61% 266 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 8.3
54% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 52.2
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 71
66% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 90%
Mtfdbak1 28MAG-1G1 128GB
45GB free
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 132 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 241
Write 132
Mixed 164
SusWrite 133
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 11.8
87% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 78.6
77% 123 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST332031 1CS 320GB
28GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 47 46 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 71.5
Write 71.2
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 45.4
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HCS5C1050CLA382 500GB
87GB free
Firmware: JC2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 64 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44% Average
Read 87.1
Write 82.5
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 66
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 320GB
39GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 48 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 50.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 48.5
64% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 1GB
0GB free, PID 5151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15
Write 4.3
Mixed 5.5
9% 8.27 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 11 13 13 10 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 11.2
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 20.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 15.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $495
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback