Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Silver 4108 331 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 75 2-Core 143 57% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 466 44% 363 Pts	64-Core 726 45% 726 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,418 2,418 User benchmarks, average bench 168% Nvidia(10DE 12A3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.5% Outstanding	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 127 Parallax 238 60% 146 fps	MRender 287 Gravity 238 Splatting 149 176% 225 fps
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 179%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$199 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 378 Write 85.3 Mixed 147 44% 203 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 18.8 88% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 101 65% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 387GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 119 Write 58.8 Mixed 81.4 65% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 12 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 45.6 MC Mixed 25.5 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 8.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16