Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 143 2-Core 50.7 65% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 216 45% 306 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 229B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 4.94 3% 4.76 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 4.67 Splatting 6.39 4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 839 811 853 807 855 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,250 Write 1,026 Mixed 967 SusWrite 826 228% 1,017 MB/s	4K Read 62.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 81.4 272% 93.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,167 DQ Write 920 DQ Mixed 1,063 790% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 369%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 2TB free Firmware: 3M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 839 897 875 877 840 873 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1,085 Write 1,028 Mixed 968 SusWrite 867 222% 987 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 85 280% 96.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,280 DQ Write 1,102 DQ Mixed 1,179 887% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 369%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB 18,166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 83 111 105 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 126 Write 107 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 97.8 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.8 202% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 27.2 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 27.4 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	33x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 90%, 1,330 samples	28x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	14x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	15x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	7x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	15x
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 79%, 5,545 samples	13x
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 1x31GBSamsungBench 43%, 2,778 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16