Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X570-PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190708
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 70.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 280 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 901 84% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,170 72% 1,170 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.6% Very good	Lighting 99 Reflection 101 Parallax 94.2 81% 98 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 87.2 Splatting 76.5 75% 93.8 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 17 68 20 97 82 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 158 Write 75.5 Mixed 134 SusWrite 61.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 10.4 64% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 89.9 81% 123 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 348GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 135 130 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 118 Write 134 Mixed 60 SusWrite 133 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	67.6% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 27.3 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 22.6 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	899x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	824x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	781x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	609x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	412x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	353x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	371x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	298x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	209x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	188x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	171x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	153x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,245

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16