Asus P5QL-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5QL-E  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080910
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 43
2-Core 82
37% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 79.9
8-Core 84.2
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 82.9
5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Asus(1043 036C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 4.81
4% 4.74 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.57
3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 58 38 64 80 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 59.9
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 65%
WD WD1600AAJS-00B4A0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 143 153 152 149 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 145
Write 159
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 149
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
407GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 136 144 143 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 141
72% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback