MSI MS-16GF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GF  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 56
2-Core 174
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 220
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
MSI(1462 1107) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.2
18% 19.2 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SF1M128GG56 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 231 255 209 76 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70% Good
Read 434
Write 280
Mixed 205
SusWrite 182
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 27.8
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 121
124% 206 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70%
Great: 80%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
649GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 133 135 137 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 129
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 134
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KFG/4G 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.T8 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GF Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback