MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 08:44
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 749
69% 579 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 91.4
59% 78.1 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 57
54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD1024 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1005 787 428 872 939 529 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,427
Mixed 331
SusWrite 760
220% 987 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 17.4
139% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 187
219% 403 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 166%
Great: 248%
Jamesdonkey JD960 960GB
673GB free
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 414 414 427 427 422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 499
Write 419
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 420
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 101%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 346 341 355 357 353 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 474
Write 360
Mixed 246
SusWrite 349
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 15.8
111% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 83.4
113% 203 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 86%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
632GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 59 58 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 140
Write 107
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 58.4
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57%
Great: 76%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 108 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 107
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 35.3
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 34.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $526
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback