Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 354
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 104
Parallax 104
81% 103 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 83.2
51% 57.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 66 25 13 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 355
Write 188
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 39.5
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 9.4
42% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 11.7
10% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
304GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 69 26 13 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 150
Write 115
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 41.3
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 1,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback