Hp-pavilion VS249AA-UUW 600-1050sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion VS249AA-UUW 600-1050sc  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON E60
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 16:06
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16% Very poor
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 62.2
24% 49.3 Pts
4-Core 51.8
8-Core 67.7
8% 59.8 Pts
64-Core 55.7
4% 55.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16%
Great: 19%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 903B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 2.5
2% 6.9 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 7.1
2% 7.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$89
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,272
Write 14
Mixed 17.8
311% 435 MB/s
4K Read 139
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
6,029% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VS249AA-UUW 600-1050sc Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion VS249AA-UUW 600-1050sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $152
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback