MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 14:37
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 89.6
45% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 83.1
8-Core 90.1
12% 86.6 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E118) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 11.4
13% 13.5 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 19.2
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 47 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 408
Write 290
Mixed 249
SusWrite 49.4
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 33.5
73% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 68.8
58% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
870GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 203 204 204 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 190
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 202
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback