| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111130 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 13 '19 at 09:50 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 99% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.9%
Above average
|
52% 82.8 Pts
|
30% 219 Pts
|
13% 210 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F2) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.2
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
15% 23.8 fps
|
23% 26.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 130 141 135 138 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
35% 156 MB/s
|
88% 31.1 MB/s
|
29% 41.6 MB/s
|
|
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.7 7.2 7.2 7.3 6.4 MB/s
|
6.47%
Terrible
|
13% 10.3 MB/s
|
62% 1.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
42.3%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
50% 80.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,863 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 511x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 325x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 186x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $171 |