Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 739
68% 568 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.19
0% 0.66 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.91
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB
320GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 394 396 403 403 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 480
Write 420
Mixed 358
SusWrite 354
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 33.8
125% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 157
123% 169 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 103%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 66 68 63 69 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 72
SusWrite 64.7
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54%
Great: 87%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 169 169 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 172
Mixed 131
SusWrite 169
118% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 96%
Great: 76%
General UDisk 134GB
125GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 14 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 8.3
Write 17.3
Mixed 11
SusWrite 14.4
19% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 10.9
834% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10.4
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 11.2
862% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 32%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
26GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 10 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 11
12% 10 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 17%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.9 7.9 8 7.6 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.23% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 15.8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 8.5
15% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.23%
Great: 18%
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 7.7 8.3 8.4 7.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Read 16
Write 9
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.9
12% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 10%
26GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.3 8 9.1 8.6 8.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 9.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 7.2
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
61% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $822
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback