Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	26.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 21:31
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 138 52% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 526 47% 398 Pts	64-Core 955 59% 955 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.6 Reflection 116 Parallax 115 81% 110 fps	MRender 95.8 Gravity 110 Splatting 92.6 81% 99.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB 44,418 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 269 279 252 259 237 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.1% Above average	Read 249 Write 240 Mixed 198 SusWrite 254 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 19.2 64% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 42 76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 123%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 223GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 207 107 93 88 88 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.4% Average	Read 233 Write 216 Mixed 182 SusWrite 135 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 17.5 56% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 132 134% 215 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 106GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 141 141 143 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 133 Write 108 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 141 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 109%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1TB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 104 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 148 Write 97.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 104 130% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 28.3 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 15 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $549

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16