Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 48 2-Core 87.9 37% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 97.9 8-Core 103 13% 100 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 875E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6952 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.38% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 2.22 2% 2.59 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.91 4% 4.16 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.38% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 120 119 128 169 127 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.5% Poor	Read 163 Write 82.6 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 137 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 10.9 43% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	3x

RAM
HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 2x4GBUnknownBench 66%, 135 samples	1x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	1x
HTH5AN8G6NCJR-VKD 1x4GBUnknownBench 38%, 76 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16