Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 04:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 161
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 275
24% 205 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 8.38
1% 7.77 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 13.6
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 119 113 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 466
Write 322
Mixed 300
SusWrite 122
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 35.7
121% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 189
144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback