Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '19 at 20:17
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 146 2-Core 287 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 566 8-Core 846 88% 706 Pts	64-Core 1,056 65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2275 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 73.8 Reflection 77.8 Parallax 67.1 60% 72.9 fps	MRender 79.3 Gravity 72.3 Splatting 75.1 62% 75.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB 11,656 User benchmarks, average bench 246% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 823 826 832 834 832 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	259% Outstanding	Read 2,026 Write 2,220 Mixed 1,729 SusWrite 881 385% 1,714 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 74.7 272% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,262 DQ Write 548 DQ Mixed 67.2 272% 625 MB/s
Poor: 184% ↑ This bench: 259% Great: 288%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 24GB free Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 271 85 76 73 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 466 Write 285 Mixed 212 SusWrite 145 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 26.1 94% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 45 DQ Mixed 25.6 22% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 802GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 130 133 131 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 151 Mixed 97 SusWrite 130 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB 9,834 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 37.9 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 27.8 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 38.2 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	881x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $176Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	839x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	576x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	344x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	276x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	267x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	144x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,009

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369