Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 28.1 1-Core 44.1 2-Core 88.8 29% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 171 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 1.84 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 4.09 2% 2.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-256G 256GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 219GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1116A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 197 195 191 188 193 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.5% Average	Read 198 Write 188 Mixed 187 SusWrite 193 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 9.2 43% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 48 72% 134 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	28x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	2x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	29x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	2x

SSD
ShanDianZhe-256GB 256GBBench 59%, 101 samples	3x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	3x
ShanDianZhe-128G 128GBBench 48%, 38 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16