HP 700-330qe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-330qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 18:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 170
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 597
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 10.2
11% 12.4 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 14.4
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
15GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 44 47 48 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 102 110 120 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65% Good
Read 118
Write 158
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 109
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 114%
General UDisk 16GB
9GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 4.8 10 8 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Read 19
Write 11.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 8.3
19% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
55% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-330qe Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 700-330qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback