ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard iPower X9110

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Packard iPower X9110 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard P5N-E SLI
Memory	0.9 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 55.3 35% 49.9 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 108 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600GS 29 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3456) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 335.23 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 0.38 1% 1.24 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 2 2% 1.89 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 19 20 15 21 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.2% Very poor	Read 40.7 Write 28.3 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 19.9 7% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 10.3 47% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 25.6 DQ Mixed 12.5 14% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 73%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 392GB free Firmware: AX1P SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 22 2.3 12 6.6 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 82.5 Write 82.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 21.7 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 62%
WD My Passport 500GB 3,424 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 270GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 37 Write 34.8 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 35.2 46% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 512, 1024, 1024 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.95% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.95% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback