| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASRock B360M Xtreme |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181025 |
| Uptime | 14.7 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 10 '19 at 23:39 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
86% 154 Pts
|
71% 571 Pts
|
45% 726 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
|
73.3%
Very good
|
79% 85.6 fps
|
62% 75.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 20 26 3 74 62 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
32% 145 MB/s
|
30% 9.47 MB/s
|
32% 47.4 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
806GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 168 168 168 166 MB/s
|
99.4%
Outstanding
|
114% 155 MB/s
|
198% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40%
Below average
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,549 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,325x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 684x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 357x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1,308x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 534x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 326x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $357 |