HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-03xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-03xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8433
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 692
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 69
Parallax 98.6
58% 79.7 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 56.5
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$63
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 936 852 858 849 842 798 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 856
252% 1122 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 88.1
292% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 901
673% 895 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 239%
Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
150GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,539
Write 5,771
Mixed 5,970
1,359% 6,093 MB/s
4K Read 362
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 243
970% 271 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 871
668% 912 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 300 301 301 303 303 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 471
Mixed 405
SusWrite 318
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.9
205% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
380GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 147 151 150 150 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 151
Write 125
Mixed 33
SusWrite 149
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A1G43TB1-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 34
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-03xx Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-03xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback