Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 22:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 275
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 806
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 234
Parallax 216
154% 213 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 231
Splatting 122
153% 197 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 143%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1509 992 1028 1023 1014 1027 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 649
Write 2,356
Mixed 668
SusWrite 1,099
273% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 61.4
220% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,198
893% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 213%
Great: 298%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 36.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 34.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback