Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 20:33
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 169
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 325
40% 305 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 73
Parallax 69
57% 70.7 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 67.8
55% 66.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 100 127 130 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 437
Write 181
Mixed 221
SusWrite 119
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 14.2
81% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 29.7
47% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 72%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
89GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 238 230 239 241 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.5% Good
Read 248
Write 236
Mixed 240
SusWrite 236
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 35.2
116% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 129%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
437GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 84.2
Write 85.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 79.5
52% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
116GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 110 111 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 66
SusWrite 110
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 04EF Team-Elite-1333 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback