Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X99  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$250
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
74% 156 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 638
67% 522 Pts
64-Core 721
48% 721 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$260
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.23
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Lighting 307
Reflection 245
Parallax 298
81% 283 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 272
Splatting 185
77% 227 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 190 184 181 179 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,649
Write 1,149
Mixed 468
SusWrite 233
193% 875 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 32.4
115% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 466
334% 432 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 134%
Great: 235%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 243 240 246 241 278 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 60.8
Write 189
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 246
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
222% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 169%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$88
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 168 166 167 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 133
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 164
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$88
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 152 154 152 153 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 113
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 151
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41% Average
Read 202
Write 34.5
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 35.7
83% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41%
Great: 77%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 114 115 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 119
Write 81.7
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 114
129% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 41.2
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 22
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 2,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $897
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $631SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback