Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Memory 33 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 32.9 19% 28.8 Pts	4-Core 34.1 8-Core 42.9 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 18.8 1% 18.8 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 087F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.50.18 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 2.41 1% 2.47 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.74 2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 292 273 209 213 210 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 407 Write 332 Mixed 275 SusWrite 249 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 24.2 81% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 49.6 DQ Mixed 29.9 25% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:0x9B05 CT8G4SFD824AC16FBD1 1x8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.2 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.6 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 27%, 1,578 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	25x

SSD
WR202KD128G E70245F5 125GBDellBench 13%, 36 samples	3x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	2x
Q Series Pro 128GBToshiba $66Bench 82%, 2,808 samples	1x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	5x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples	3x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16