Acer Aspire 8730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 8730  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BigBear2
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 945 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081229
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 04:13
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6500
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 57
35% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 52.3
8-Core 57.9
7% 55.1 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT
Acer(1025 017E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 0.78
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 179 175 101 66 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.4% Above average
Read 249
Write 241
Mixed 227
SusWrite 131
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 30.8
100% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 156
118% 159 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 8730 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback