Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80QQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory7.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4288U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 162
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 249
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 920MX
Legend(17AA 382B) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.87 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 7.83
Splatting 7.61
6% 7.05 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 119 138 122 94 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 274
Mixed 330
SusWrite 122
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 37.4
153% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 151
137% 203 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback